Fuel-fed Fires

Fuel-fed Fires

According to the U.S. Fire Administration, post-collision fires are the leading cause of vehicle-related deaths.  These fires often occur in accidents which might have caused only minor injuries, had a defect in the car's construction not made it possible for a collision to ignite a deadly fire.  Design and manufacturing defects that can cause a fire to ignite include:


  • Failure to incorporate anti-siphoning valves
  • Failure to include fuel filler tube check valves
  • Misrouting of fuel lines
  • Failure to protect fuel lines
  • Placement of the fuel tank within the vehicle's crush zone

The cost to the manufacturer to do something as simple as incorporate safety valves into the fuel line may only be pennies per vehicle.  When the manufacturer values profits over people's lives, the attorneys at Langdon & Emison are committed to bringing their legal experience and expertise to bear on the negligent defendants. 

Our lawyers have litigated dozens of post-accident fire cases across the country, including the landmark case of Baker v. General Motors, which won a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court and coined a new term - the Ivey Memo - for being the first case in the country to get evidence admitted into trial of an automaker's cost-benefit analysis, comparing the cost of fixing an automotive defect versus the cost to the company in legal and settlement fees caused by lawsuits arising due to wrongful death cases.

Automobile accidents are bad enough, but when an auto defect turns a collision into a conflagration, the negligent automakers need to be held accountable for the needless tragedy they have caused.  If you or a loved one has been involved in a car accident that involved a fuel-fed fire, contact the experienced trial attorneys at Langdon & Emison for a skilled evaluation of the causes of the incident and the parties who are responsible.

Call us toll free at
(866)959-7305

Verdicts

Kumar v. Toyota
$59,000,000 Verdict

Wasilik v. Ford
$26,400,000 Verdict

Martin v. Ford
$16,940,000 Verdict

Mathes v. Ford
$12,500,000 Verdict

Baker v. GM
$11,300,000 Verdict

Mason v. Wal-Mart
$6,000,000 Verdict

Newton v. Trade Winds
$4,000,000 Verdict

Collins v. Missouri Bar Plan
$3,000,000 Verdict

Ludwick v. United Expresslines
$2,150,000 Verdict

This is a partial list of our results.
Recoveries for our clients total
more than half a billion dollars.


911 Main Street
Lexington, Missouri 64067
660-259-6175

55 Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
312-595-1700

110 E. Lockwood, Suite 150
St. Louis, Missouri 63119
314-638-1500


Our cases have been featured on

LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbel

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. [ Site Map ] [ Bookmark Us ]